Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Books I am reading: THE STORY OF ART, E.H.GOMBRICH

The Story of Art    by E. H. Gombrich

He begins the book saying that there is no good or bad art and asks the question ‘’which work of art is not?’’
Gombrich states ‘’The trouble with beauty is that tastes and standards of what is beautiful vary so much.’’
His book is very thick and heavy but it is very understandable.  He begins with the cave paintings of prehistoric times and moves on to the Egyptians who became the leaders of the world in art some five thousand years ago.   Their method of drawing was childlike and repetitious ‘’everything had to be represented from its most characteristic angle’’ says Gombrich.  If you look at figures of the early Egyptian art you can see that all the figures are very similar.  There were rules, almost laws to painting and all artists obeyed them. 








Detail of figure in wall-painting from the tomb of Khnumhotep, c. 1900 BC.









For 3000 years nothing changed and the art stayed the same.  A heretic king, Amenophis IV was the first to break with the old traditions.  He wanted the paintings he commissioned to be more real and life like as seen in this piece.

Aknaten and Nefertiti with their children c.1345 BC

 If you look at the painting it almost looks 'cartoonish' (my word) with the king kissing his child, and the other two children interacting with the mother.  A vast difference from the normal in that period.









His reign ended and the new king did not embrace the new changes in art and soon returned to the old rules of art.   However, this painting of Tutunkamun and his wife were found in his tomb c. 1330 BC.  This work of art is much more realistic than the older style.


The purpose of art in that time was to record their lives and history, as decorations in there tombs.  The job of the artist ‘’resembled a map-maker rather than that of a painter’’, states Gombrich.  
The purpose of art in that time was to record their lives and history, as decorations in there tombs.  The Egyptians also taught many Greek artists their methods of painting so much of the early Greek art looks like the art from Egypt.  

Greek art in the first few centuries was very primitive as seen in this vase named:

''The Morning of the Dead''  c. 700 BC
The Greeks gradually began to produce figures that where more life like rather than following the rules and methods. As this vase shows:
''Achilles and Ajax Playing Draughts'' c. 640 BC

Unfortunately most of the stone statues were carved in the likeness of one of the Gods worshiped during that time and were destroyed with the onset of Christianity.  The Christians only wanted one God. Most Greek statues in the world today are copies of the original works.  Such as this statue named :
''Athena Parthenos'' c. 447 - 432 BC

This statue was copied by the Romans in marble.  The original of this statue as stated by the author says ''it was like a gigantic wooden image, some 36 feet(11 metres) high, as high as a tree, covered all over with precious materials, the armor and garments of gold, the skin of ivory.'' The statue would have never survived the centuries.
By the end of the 5th century artists began to change from craftsmen who did their work following the rules and established methods to some what free spirits who were able to interpret what they saw in their own unique way.
 ''Hermes with the young Dionysus'' c. 340BC
This artist Praxiteles was according to Gombrich was ''the greatest artist of the century. Unfortunately most of his works disappeared.''  This particular piece was found in Olympia during the 19th Century and it is believed to be an original.  This statue shows the progress made by the Greeks in reproducing an image of a figure compared to the Egyptians.

Probably one of the most well known works of art at that time was found on the Island of Melos:

''Venus of Milo'' c. 200 BC


''Some of the works of the classical sculpture which have enjoyed the greatest fame in later times were created in the Hellenistic period'' states Gombrich.  One of these sculptures called:

''Laocoon and his Sons'' c. 175 - 50 BC


I was facinated by the description of this sculpture.  The statue represents a scene which ''was described in Virgil's Aeneid''(Gombrich) about two serpents coming from the sea to catch a priest and his two sons....''.
I was actually fortunate enough to see this incredible work of art in an exhibition in Venice in November last year.  I could hardly believe my eyes.  

Around this time in history wealthy people began to collect works of art, and if they could not buy the original they would pay huge prices for artists to copy the originals.  During this time painters were the most important artists with many stories being written about them.   There were stories about artists who ''painted from everyday life'' states (Gombrich) but sadly most of this work has been lost.  With the exception of Pompeii which was buried under the ashes of Mt Vesuvius which erupted in 79 AD.  

This is an example which can still be seen in Pompeii today depicting ordinary life of people standing around watching people play games.


From the 1st to the 4th century when the Romans were conquering the word art remained more or less the same.  The artists who did work were mainly Greeks and  ''most Roman collectors bought works of the great Greek masters, or copies of them''. 
''When Rome became mistress of the world'' (Gombrich) the artists were required to put their skills to other uses such as civil engineering.  Roads, aqueducts, public baths and of course incredibly impressive buildings  such as the Colosseum.

Another equally as impressive building is the Pantheon (temple of all Gods).  ''Its interior, is a huge round hall with a vaulted roof and a circular opening at the top through which one sees the open sky.  There is no other window, but the whole room receives ample like from above'' is a very adequate description of Gombrich as it is still today a magnificent building.
I have been fortunate enough to be there when it has been raining and the priests put a rope barrier around the area in the middle that is wet and everything goes on as normal. it was converted into a church in the early christian era and as such was never allowed to fall into disrepair, it is still a church that has services and it was built in 130 AD.

Another task given to the artists was to carve great columns to create records of the Romans' victories and their campaigns.  The art of Rome at the time was very basic and down to earth.  ''.... the Roman way of telling a story and glorifying a hero was adopted by artists who set themselves the tasks of illustrating the story of a peaceful conquest, the story of Buddha.''  This happened in the far off destination of India states Gomich.  The Indians created an image of the Head of Buddha in the same way that the Romans and Greeks had produced beautiful images of gods and heroes.







Assignment 2

This is the final project for Assignment 2.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Research Point: George Stubbs

George Stubbs 1724 -1806

This engraving plate is from from George Stubb's  book called ‘The Anatomy of the Horse’.  It was the first study of the anatomy of a horse since Carlo Ruini had produced a schematic woodcut 160 years previously.
 The print shows the side view of the first stage of dissection with just the skin removed.
 Stubbs was a scientist and an artist.  He dissected the horse with the assistance of his partner Mary Spencer.  He would draw in detail every section of the animal as he removed the layers.  Eventually he produced a book in 1766 that was the guide for veterinarians for well over a century.

 Whistlejacket

This beautiful painting shows the knowledge of not only how to use the paint but the exact location of all the different planes and angles of a horse.
George was also asked to draw the first kangaroo from Australia returned to England which was stuffed.  He like to draw and study many different animals including dogs, pigs, rhinoceros, lions, tigers and zebras.  Many of these animals were bought to him from overseas after long voyages.
Stubbs was given the fur, the scull and a few bones so he put together what he thought the animal would look like.  He was not able to dissect an animal and had to be satisfied by what I would think he was told about the animal.  Unlike a dog for instance, that he could dissect and obtain the same information as he could about the horse.
As this painting shows called ''Spaniel in a Landscape'' 1784

 ''Mares and foals without a background''1762

George Stubbs was incredibly talented and the monumental amount of anatomical drawings he did with his animal subject gave him the knowledge he needed to produce in precise detail the chosen subject.  He is described as an incredibly disciplined person who drank only water for 40 years and would walk for miles every day.






Drawing Animals

I did many drawings of my beautiful dog Lucy.  She is a cross between a Breton Spaniel and an English Spaniel.  She would only stay in the same position for a few minutes and always with her eyes open looking at me and wondering why I was looking at her.

Fish On a Plate
I am very happy with the results of this painting.  It looks better on paper and I think that I was able to capture the true image of the fish.  I did buy the fish and then take a photograph of it as I wanted to paint it looking down on it.  I would have struggled without a photograph to look at.

Check and Log
The main challenge with drawing my dog was that she is very alert and constantly watching me to see what I am doing, except of course when I am not looking at her then she sleeps happily.  I found that drawing her was much like drawing anything else the more I looked the more I saw.  This course has already taught me to really look at things that go into my drawing.
I used watercolour and ink for my fish painting and I enjoyed it so much.  The black enamel dish was perfect with crayon spots and indian ink.  I also had some japanese water colour in silver that I was able to use across the fish adding to the reality of the fish.  
I plan to draw some more dogs, as I find dogs so interesting.  I go to a local dog park and I will take my sketch book next time.  I am going to also try to draw different kinds of birds.



Drawing Plants and Flowers

Negative space in a plant
Exploring Coloured Media

Drawing with other colour media

Check and Log
The exercise in negative space will add a new dimention to my looking at a subject. I tried to measure with a pencil in order to get the correct proportions with the subjects.  I am not sure if i did achieve the effect I three dimensional space in all drawings but in most I think I did.

Research Point: Ben Nicholson

Ben Nicholson

Why does he simplify still life forms and negative space and superimpose them on the Cornish landscape?



He continued to work as he did in London when he first arrived in Cornwall on his ‘white relief’ art.

 

  It was suggested in the film made about him and his wife Barbara Hepworth…….. that he turned to landscapes in order to earn a living during the war years around the 1940’s and he would paint landscapes observed through a window and incorporate still life elements in the forground.  I would think also that the weather would be extremely cold and this was the best option to keep warm.


This is a beautiful painting done looking through a window at the landscape in the 1930's.






This is done in the early 1940's and you can see how he has used his previous concept of painting through the window to add still life to the painting.
And and even later painting from this period.